Written before the game and kept as published. Final: New York Jets 12, Chicago Bears 23 — the graded call is above.
The Jets travel to face the Bears in Week 4. Our power ratings put the Bears 2nd of 32 at +3.2 (Playoff tier) and the Jets 27th at -2.7 (Below Avg tier) — a 5.9-point gap that home field and the quarterback situation turn into a 2.5-point line on the Bears, 58% to win. It rates as the 3rd-widest of the 16 games in Week 4. One input in this line is not a rating: the Bears are without their usual starting quarterback (Tyson Bagent starts), and our QB-out term moves the line 5.7 points toward the Jets — already inside the number above.
The sharpest unit gap in the game runs one way: the Bears offense grades +2.5 (6th of 32) against a Jets defense at -2.0 (25th) — 4.5 points of separation on our scale, and the single biggest reason the line sits where it does. Going the other direction, the Jets offense (-1.4, 28th) meets the Bears defense (+0.2, 7th), a 1.6-point gap.
Zoom out to the full season and the model projects the Bears at 10.7 wins (favored in 14 of 17) and the Jets at 6.3 (favored in 3) — 4.4 wins apart across the year. By win probability this is the 17th-hardest game on the Bears' schedule and the 1st-hardest on the Jets'. Nothing on the Jets' schedule projects harder than this one.
On the calendar, the Jets are on 7 days and the Bears are on 6 days. The Bears are 3 games into a home stand. Rest measures at about a tenth of a point per day (2013-2025), and the closing line already charges for it, so a normal-week gap is not where an edge comes from.
One team has owned this series: the Bears are 5-1 in 6 regular-season meetings since 2002. They last met in 2022: Jets won 31-10 in November. Over their last 4 meetings the Bears are 3-1. Worth saying plainly — the model does not know any of that. It reads 2026 ratings and nothing else, so a lopsided series is a story, not a number on this page.
Calibration check, because a near-even number is the easiest kind to overtrust: across 3266 walk-forward games (2013-2024) the model gave a side 55-60% in 797 of them, and those sides won 57%. The Bears at 58% are in that band. A margin that thin is why we would rather wait for a price than call it a lean.
Kalshi listed this game as KXNFLGAME-26OCT04NYJCHI, and the contract has settled now that the game has been played. The last price we archived before kickoff is in the settled-market section on this page; there is no live price and no position left to take.
Prediction markets are not sportsbooks — you trade a contract that settles at $1 or $0, not a wager against a house line. Informational only; trade responsibly.