Updated · model ratings
Sunday, October 18, 2026 · SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA
Quick Answer
Final (Sunday, October 18, 2026): Arizona Cardinals 18, Los Angeles Rams 16 — NFL Week 6, 2026. Our pre-game market-anchored line had the Rams by 12.5 (87% to win); the Cardinals won, so that call missed. The last Kalshi price we archived before kickoff had the Rams at 87c. The graded recap below covers how it happened and how each player call on our board resolved.
Settled
Arizona Cardinals 18, Los Angeles Rams 16Final
Model call: MISSOur pre-game market-anchored line had the Rams by 12.5 (87% to win). The Cardinals won — that call missed.
Closing-line value on the Rams: +1c — we archived the Rams at 86c on Oct 11; the last Kalshi price before kickoff was 87c on Oct 18. The market moved toward our side before kickoff.
Next: NFL Week 7 predictions →See how the model has done vs Kalshi →
No actionable edge on this game — 1 market priced and every one inside our tolerance.
Edge is model probability minus the market's implied probability, in percentage points. Prop rows show our tier, and our odds only where our probabilities are calibrated; props carry no Kelly stake. One published number per market: where our sources disagreed we publish the most conservative defensible figure, and where they disagreed by more than 15 points the row is a conflict and carries no stake. ¼ Kelly is the share of a bankroll quarter-Kelly would put on the row at the published price — click it to size against your own bankroll on our Kelly calculator, or call kelly_size from our MCP server inside your own agent.
Arizona scored all 18 of its points on Ryland field goals and held a Rams offense that came in leading the league in total yards to 286. Los Angeles lost kicker Blake Grupe to a knee injury on a first-quarter kickoff, turned it over on downs twice in the second half and lost a Tyler Higbee fumble in Arizona territory. Matthew Stafford still led an 86-yard drive that ended in Colby Parkinson’s six-yard touchdown, awarded on review with 47 seconds left, and punter Ethan Evans kicked the go-ahead extra point. Jacoby Brissett then moved Arizona 40 yards in five plays and Ryland won it. ESPN’s archived DraftKings line had the Rams −13.5 at both the open and the close; 34 points finished under a total archived at 46.5 and 51.5.
Cardinals 18—Rams 16
Final✗ Call missedThe chip reads a miss. It grades our stored probability, which had the Rams at 86.6%: the market’s own number, anchored at weight zero (w = 0) from a 12.5-point line, and Arizona won outright. The model’s own read was the Rams by 9.54, a 2.96-point lean toward Arizona, tier WATCH, and Arizona won by two: the lean was right, and it is graded apart from the record as every WATCH row is. The quarterback gate read PASS. The ledger holds no position. Its two rows on this game were Arizona moneylines, and both were voided before kickoff (a LOW row on 2026-10-07 under the never-published rule, and a MODERATE row on 2026-10-12 as no longer an edge), so the upset counts in neither direction. The final pre-kickoff board carried no PLAY rows. Fifteen visible WATCH rows went 14-1. Puka Nacua under 6.5 and 7.5 catches won on six, Kendrick Bourne over 2.5 and 3.5 catches won on five, Michael Wilson’s three unders won on four, and the Kyren Williams, Parkinson, Higbee and Elijah Higgins overs all won. The one loss was Davis Allen over 0.5 catches: he caught none. Six rows on suppressed stats (four Stafford passing-yards rungs, Brissett passing yards and a Nacua anytime touchdown) were never displayed and count in neither direction.
DraftKings via ESPN, one book. Not the Kalshi price — that block reads our own tape.
The spread did not move. The total rose 5 to 51.5; the game landed on 34.
Q1
Brissett’s first-quarter throw for Trey McBride was intercepted at the Arizona 32, and Grupe made a 44-yard field goal. On the ensuing kickoff Grupe had to make the tackle himself on a 40-yard return and was injured on the play, leaving the Rams without a kicker. Ryland answered with field goals from 34 and 30 yards.
Q2
The Rams went 73 yards in 12 plays and Stafford hit Corum for a 15-yard touchdown, but with no kicker they went for two and Stafford was sacked. Ryland’s 22-yarder with 46 seconds left in the half tied it at 9.
Q4
Arizona opened the second half with a 15-play, 56-yard drive for Ryland’s 38-yarder, and after the Rams turned it over on downs it went 64 yards in 14 plays for a 27-yarder and a 15-9 lead. On the Rams’ next possession Cody Simon forced a Higbee fumble that Arizona recovered at its own 25, and the Rams’ following drive ended on downs too.
Q4
The Rams took over at their 14 with 2:48 left, and Stafford found Nacua for 43 yards to the Arizona 34. Parkinson was ruled down at the 1 with 47 seconds left before review reversed it to a six-yard touchdown, and Evans kicked the extra point for a 16-15 lead. Brissett hit Jalen Brooks for 21, an unnecessary-roughness penalty on Josh Wallace added 15, and Ryland made the 43-yarder as time expired.
AP via ESPN — Cardinals beat Rams 18-16 on Chad Ryland’s 6th field goal as time expires
Reporting verified 2026-10-18. Further sources: ESPN — box score · ESPN — play-by-play · AP via ESPN — Cardinals beat Rams 18-16 on Chad Ryland’s 6th field goal as time expires
Both quarterbacks are confirmed, so the gate has nothing to add. What matters is who is blocking and who is covering: the Rams lose Alaric Jackson to a two-game suspension on the same week Garrett stays on injured reserve, and the Cardinals arrive with a seventh-round rookie at left tackle, Marvin Harrison Jr. traded to Houston, and three safeties who did not practise Wednesday against the quarterback leading the league in passing yards. Our lean sits with Arizona against the number, at WATCH tier — and the most likely explanation is that the rating cannot see any of that.
Rams pass offense · Cardinals coverage
This is the market’s case and it is a strong one. Arizona allows a league-high 0.72 passing points per attempt, a league-high 9.1 yards per attempt and a league-high 10.1% touchdown rate, and the man coming in has thrown for 300-plus yards in four straight games and leads the NFL in completions, attempts and yards. Arizona also answers two-tight-end sets with base personnel on 78% of snaps, and Stafford against base this year is 38-of-55 for 9.1 a throw with four touchdowns and no interceptions. Then Wednesday happened: Budda Baker sat for rest, Wydett Williams is in the concussion protocol and Andrew Wingard’s knee kept him out, which is the entire safety room, with Kitan Crawford limited in his first work since going on injured reserve after Week 1. Puka Nacua caught a career-high 17 balls against Buffalo on Monday night; Davante Adams has four touchdowns on 27 catches. The Rams are 16-3 against Arizona under McVay.
Source: Sharp Football Analysis — Cardinals–Rams Week 6 worksheet
Cardinals pass rush · Rams pass protection
Here is the part the number may not be carrying. Stafford has been sacked seven times on 216 dropbacks, the lowest rate of any starter, and a large share of that is a left side anchored by Jackson — who, after Monday’s overtime loss, followed Bradley Chubb through the jersey exchange and punched him. The league handed him two games, so he is out against Arizona and Las Vegas, and no replacement was named by the club this week. On the other side of the ball the Rams still do not have Garrett, who had knee surgery in September; McVay said Tuesday he will not practise this week and will not play Sunday. Without him the Rams have eight sacks in five games, Byron Young carrying 3.5 of them, and Aaron Donald — 35, back from retirement — has played three games with no sacks and sat out last week’s report with a back injury. Arizona’s rush is modest, eleven sacks spread across nine players, but it has pressured people: Josh Sweat and Baron Browning sat Wednesday for rest, not injury. A blind-side rookie against a rested veteran edge is a very different proposition from a Pro Bowl tackle.
Source: Yahoo Sports — Rams–Cardinals injury report: LA in great shape to start Week 6 (2026-10-14)
Both run offenses · both run defenses
Arizona’s run defense gave up 163 rushing yards to the Lions and 140 to San Francisco, and sits at 4.4 yards a carry allowed on the season; Kyren Williams is at 4.9 a carry with four rushing touchdowns and Blake Corum at 4.8 behind him. Going the other way the Rams are not good against the run either — 4.6 a carry allowed, 26th, and Buffalo ran for 234 on Monday — but Arizona cannot exploit it the way Buffalo did. Love, the rookie first-round back, did not practise Wednesday with a left ankle he hurt in Week 4 and played through against Detroit for 12 carries and 22 yards; LaFleur said the staff is resting him and will "see how the week goes". Tyler Allgeier behind him is at 3.4 a carry. And the man who would open those lanes, Paris Johnson Jr., tore his left biceps in New York and is out for the year; seventh-round rookie Jayden Williams took the job, with Jedrick Wills Jr. signed off Buffalo’s practice squad as cover. A rookie left tackle and a hobbled back is not the roster to grind out a road game against a defense that is third in yards allowed.
Cardinals pass offense · the quarterback picture
Brissett starting is not a Week 6 story, it is a March one: Arizona released Kyler Murray on 11 March rather than carry a $52.7m cap number, and LaFleur, hired from McVay’s staff, built around the 34-year-old who made twelve starts in 2025. He is completing 66% but at 5.6 yards an attempt, last among qualifiers, with nine touchdowns and five picks, and he was sacked 43 times in twelve starts last year behind a better line than this one. The receiver room thinned on Monday: Harrison, inactive against Detroit while the deal was finalised, went to Houston for a 2027 second- and sixth-rounder. What remains is a tight-end-first offense — Trey McBride leads the team with 56 targets and three scores, Michael Wilson has 51, and a one-game tight end named Teagan Quitoriano caught two touchdowns last week. The one thing Arizona does well is hold the ball: five giveaways in five games against the Rams’ eight. If the Cardinals cover this, it is because the Rams keep handing it back behind a backup left tackle, not because Arizona moves it.
Reporting verified 2026-10-15. Further sources: Arizona Sports — Cardinals–Rams Week 6 injury report: Jeremiyah Love not participating Wednesday (2026-10-14) · Yahoo Sports — Rams–Cardinals injury report: LA in great shape to start Week 6 (2026-10-14) · therams.com — Rams injury updates (McVay on Garrett, 2026-10-13) · therams.com — From the podium: McVay and Stafford react to the overtime loss to Buffalo (2026-10-12) · Spectrum News / AP — Rams LT Alaric Jackson strikes Bills LB Bradley Chubb after OT game (2026-10-13) · Raising Zona — Cardinals vs. Rams Week 6: how to watch, injury news, storylines (LaFleur on Brissett, 2026-10-14) · Arizona’s Family — Paris Johnson Jr. out for the season, LaFleur says (2026-10-05) · Arizona’s Family — Cardinals agree to terms on trade sending Marvin Harrison Jr. to Texans (2026-10-12) · azcardinals.com — Free-agent primer 2026: quarterback (Murray release plan, Brissett’s 2025 line) · Sharp Football Analysis — Cardinals–Rams Week 6 worksheet · Pro Football Reference — 2026 Arizona Cardinals · Pro Football Reference — 2026 Los Angeles Rams
Every defense's injury load this week, by unit: the defensive injury cluster board.
ARI
-4.4
LAR
+3.0
This one's been played. Get the full Week 6 card free, every remaining game priced against the market.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cardinals
13%
fair value (books)
Rams
87%
fair value (books)
Run this matchup yourself → Full PWR board for all 32 → Player prop gaps for this game → Whose number this is →
30%
Madden 27
70%
Madden 27
Go Pro · 26% off your first year
Pro is the layer around the free game edges: fair value against the live Kalshi price on every market, edge alerts in Discord the moment a gap opens, and the full win-total, championship and projection boards.
$111 for the first year, then $150/yr. Code applies automatically. Ends Dec 31. Monthly is $14.99/mo.
Every signal graded in public, losers left on the board. See the record →
Our margin distribution against every Kalshi spread strike listed for this game. A single line says we lean one way; the ladder says whether that is about the middle of the distribution or its tail.
This ladder is settled: the rungs above are the pre-kickoff record, not a live quote.
Fewer than three strikes have both a two-sided Kalshi book and a model number inside our published 30–70% band, so there is no shape call here. The market prices are complete.
Gold is our distribution, parchment is the Kalshi contract at each strike; the band between them is green where our probability is higher and purple where it is lower. We publish our number only where we have measured it to be calibrated, between 30% and 70%; rungs outside that range show the market only, and a rung where our number sits more than 30 points from a liquid market is refused outright — a gap that size is a bug until proven otherwise. A contract pays $1 if it settles YES, so a price in cents is an implied probability. Prediction markets carry risk; contracts can settle at $0.
Share this Oracle Ladder
10,000 simulated seasons on our preseason power ratings — real NFL tiebreakers, real 2026 schedule, no injuries or market prices. The season sim fits its own home-field (2.0 points, from played games); the game model above uses +2.5. How it works →
One page per player: every strike Kalshi lists, the sportsbook consensus at the same threshold, the season projection and the measured range.
Written before the game and kept as published. Final: Arizona Cardinals 18, Los Angeles Rams 16 — the graded call is above.
The model does not think this one is close. The Rams rate 3rd of 32 at +3.0, the Cardinals 31st at -4.4, and once home field is applied the line lands on the Rams by 9.5 — 75% to win. That is the widest gap among the 14 games on the Week 6 board. A preseason rating spread this size is not a promise: it says nothing about turnovers, health, or a defense that shows up different than last year. What it does say is that the Cardinals need the price to be wrong, not the matchup.
The sharpest unit gap in the game runs one way: the Rams offense grades +2.9 (5th of 32) against a Cardinals defense at -3.8 (30th) — 6.6 points of separation on our scale, and the single biggest reason the line sits where it does. Going the other direction, the Cardinals offense (-0.6, 22nd) meets the Rams defense (+0.3, 6th), a 0.8-point gap.
Zoom out to the full season and the model projects the Rams at 8.8 wins (favored in 13 of 17) and the Cardinals at 6.0 (favored in 2) — 2.8 wins apart across the year. By win probability this is the 17th-hardest game on the Rams' schedule and the 2nd-hardest on the Cardinals'. It is the softest spot on the Rams' entire schedule.
On the standings side, NFC West games are the ones that decide the tiebreakers. Head-to-head record is the first tiebreaker between two teams in the same division, and division record is the next — so the value of this result is not just the win column. They meet again in Week 10, which makes a sweep the outcome with real leverage on the NFC West race.
Recent history, for context only: 48 regular-season meetings since 2002, 28-20 in the Rams' favour, plus 2 playoff games. They last met in 2025: Rams won 37-20 in January. Over their last 4 meetings the Rams are 3-1. It is not an input to the line — rosters turn over faster than series records do.
A note on confidence this high: the model has only been this sure 312 times in 3266 walk-forward games from 2013-2024. Teams it put in the 70-75% range won 71% of those. So a 75% Rams number is well supported by the record, and still loses about 29 times in 100 — which is exactly why the position is a price question, not a certainty question.
Kalshi listed this game as KXNFLGAME-26OCT18ARILAR, and the contract has settled now that the game has been played. The last price we archived before kickoff is in the settled-market section on this page; there is no live price and no position left to take.
Full division picture on the NFC West hub.
Prediction markets are not sportsbooks — you trade a contract that settles at $1 or $0, not a wager against a house line. Informational only; trade responsibly.
This game has been played, so nothing above is a live market. Our pre-game market-anchored line number was 87% for the Rams. Those are kept as the record of what the model said before kickoff, not as a quote you can act on — the contract has settled at $1 or $0.
Each venue’s own price where we have one; Robinhood and Coinbase resell the Kalshi contract. Home-side price shown.
| Venue | Rams | Trade |
|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | game played — market settled | Trade on Kalshi → |
| Novig | 87% 87c | Open Novig → |
| Polymarket US | no captured price for this game — US exchange | Sign-up offer → |
| Robinhoodsame Kalshi contract | same Kalshi contract, not listed yet | Open Robinhood → |
| Coinbasesame Kalshi contract | same Kalshi contract, not listed yet | Open Coinbase → |
| DraftKings Predictions | price not available — sign-up offer → | Sign-up offer → |
| FanDuel Predicts | price not available — sign-up offer → | Sign-up offer → |
A price under a venue name is that venue’s own; Robinhood and Coinbase list the same Kalshi contract. DraftKings Predictions and FanDuel Predicts run on exchanges we have no price feed for, so they carry an offer and no number. We earn a referral credit or commission when you sign up through these links; it never changes the price or the model. Disclosure.
A live tile locked to Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — our model's win probability against the Kalshi price for this one game, not "whichever game is closest today" — for a team blog, a newsletter or a Discord landing page. Free to preview on your own page; publishing runs on an Enterprise license, and the credit line stays on.
The MPU (300×250) and Leaderboard (728×90) sizes are IAB standard ad units — paste one where an ad already goes. Every NFL prediction-market widget.
Article width · 560×320
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-game/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/hero" width="560" height="320" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 prediction — model vs Kalshi from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-game">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
Sidebar · 320×340
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-game/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/sidebar" width="320" height="340" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 prediction — model vs Kalshi from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-game">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
MPU · ad slot · 300×250
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-game/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/mpu" width="300" height="250" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 prediction — model vs Kalshi from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-game">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
Leaderboard · ad slot · 728×90
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-game/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/leaderboard" width="728" height="90" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 prediction — model vs Kalshi from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-game">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
A live card locked to Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — the Kalshi price at every spread strike for this one game — for a preview post or a game-day thread. Free to preview on your own page; publishing runs on an Enterprise license, and the credit line stays on.
Every NFL prediction-market widget.
Article width · 560×300
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-ladder/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/hero" width="560" height="300" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 Kalshi spread ladder from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-ladder">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
Sidebar · 320×280
<iframe src="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/embed/nfl-ladder/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026/sidebar" width="320" height="280" frameborder="0" loading="lazy" title="Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 — model vs Kalshi — PredictionMarketsPicks"> </iframe> <p style="margin:6px 0 0;font:12px/1.4 system-ui,sans-serif;text-align:center">Cardinals vs Rams, Week 6 Kalshi spread ladder from <a href="https://predictionmarketspicks.com/nfl/cardinals-vs-rams-week-06-2026?utm_source=embed&utm_medium=widget&utm_campaign=nfl-ladder">PredictionMarketsPicks</a></p>
Arizona Cardinals 18, Los Angeles Rams 16 — final, played Sunday, October 18, 2026; our pre-game market-anchored line had the Rams by 12.5 (87% to win), and the Cardinals won, so that call missed. The full graded recap, with every player call resolved, is on this page.
Before kickoff the market line favored the Rams by 12.5 points, a 87% win probability over the Cardinals. That number is kept on this page as the record of the call; Kalshi's KXNFLGAME-26OCT18ARILAR market has since settled, so no price on it is live.
The 9.5-point line comes from a 7.4-point rating gap, 2.5 points of home field, and a single-game margin has roughly a 14.4-point standard deviation around it — which is why the Cardinals still project at 13% rather than zero. Their best structural path is the Cardinals defense (-3.8, 30th of 32) holding up. Ratings do not price injuries or turnover luck, which is where most upsets actually come from.
The contract will be KXNFLGAME-26OCT18ARILAR on Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated exchange available in most states, with sports contracts restricted in some. It has not opened yet; when it does, the model would take the Rams at 85c or below, or the Cardinals at 11c or below. There is no point spread — you buy a yes or no contract on a team and it settles at $1 or $0.
Arizona Cardinals visit the Los Angeles Rams on Sunday, October 18, 2026 — a Sunday game in NFL Week 6, at SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA.
Across all 17 games the model projects the Rams at 8.8 wins (favored in 13) and the Cardinals at 6.0 (favored in 2). This game ranks 17th-hardest on the Rams' schedule and 2nd-hardest on the Cardinals', by win probability.
Kalshi listed this game as KXNFLGAME-26OCT18ARILAR, and the contract has settled now that the game has been played. The last price we archived before kickoff is in the settled-market section on this page; there is no live price and no position left to take.
This game has been played, so the Week 6 market KXNFLGAME-26OCT18ARILAR has settled — there is no position left to take on it. While it was open it traded as an event contract rather than a point spread: Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated exchange available in most states, with sports contracts restricted in some, you bought a YES or NO contract on a team between 1c and 99c, and it settled at $1 or $0, so the price paid was the break-even probability. Kalshi lists the next week's games on the same terms.
71% of the time. Over 3266 walk-forward games from 2013-2024 — trained only on prior seasons, no market line as an input — the model put a team in the 70-75% range 312 times, and those teams won 71% of them. The Rams at 75% over the Cardinals sit in that band, off a 9.5-point model line. Straight-up across all 3266 graded games the model picked winners at 59.6%, with a Brier score of 0.236 against 0.25 for a coin flip.
Our model puts it at 13% against a market price implying 13%, an edge of +0.4 points. Model 13% vs the last Kalshi price before kickoff, 13% on ARI — kept as the pre-game record. We pass — no position.
Every Thursday before kickoff: the full Week 6 card, market price vs our number. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
They run it back in Week 10. Division games are the pairings the model gets two swings at, and the second line usually moves off what the first one showed. Cardinals–Rams, Week 10 →
Seahawks at BroncosModel: even
Texans at JaguarsModel: Jaguars −2.5
Bears at FalconsModel: Falcons −0.5
Ravens at BrownsModel: Browns −4.5
Titans at ColtsModel: Colts −6.5
Jets at PatriotsModel: Patriots −8.5
Saints at GiantsModel: Giants −0.5
Panthers at EaglesModel: Panthers −1.5
Steelers at BuccaneersModel: Steelers −2
Chargers at ChiefsModel: Chiefs −5.5
Bills at RaidersModel: Bills −3
Cowboys at PackersModel: Packers −4.5
Commanders at 49ersModel: 49ers −7The engine behind these numbers is callable from Claude, ChatGPT or Grok through our MCP server — every Kalshi prop this week priced venue by venue, spread and win-total ladders against the whole distribution, correlation-aware same-game combos, and the weekly game edges. The free tools answer with no key and no account.
See the in-season NFL tools →Prediction markets carry risk. Contracts can settle at $0. Informational only — not financial advice. Trade responsibly.
